Mold Approval: Approve, Condition, or Hold
A structured buyer workspace for deciding whether the evidence supports approval, controlled conditional approval, or a hold.
Mold Approval: Approve, Condition, or Hold
Mold approval should follow a traceable review of defects, dimensions, process stability, documentation, and every open item. A good final sample alone does not close the approval package.
Static review summary: approve only when required evidence is closed, approve with conditions only when controlled open items have owners and release criteria, and hold when critical risk remains unresolved.
Confirm the sample identity, cavity set, revision, process record, and issues list before reviewing sign-off.
Structural findings normally require closure evidence; cosmetic findings need an agreed acceptance standard or correction.
Review critical dimensions, assembly fit, and cavity-to-cavity variation rather than accepting a selected sample.
Ask whether the approved samples came from a repeatable, documented process under production-relevant conditions.
Missing ownership, maintenance, process, acceptance, or transfer documents can remain a commercial and operational risk after sign-off.
Every conditional item should have an owner, due date, evidence requirement, and written release condition.
Approve only when required evidence is closed; use conditions for controlled open items and hold for unresolved critical risk.
This buyer-side explainer is a review framework, not a substitute for engineering, quality, commercial, or legal approval procedures. Approval requirements should be verified against the actual program, contract, drawing, samples, tests, and supplier records.